en:brochures:antifalefkosha:omospondia
Differences
This shows you the differences between two versions of the page.
Both sides previous revisionPrevious revisionNext revision | Previous revision | ||
en:brochures:antifalefkosha:omospondia [2025/02/27 15:38] – no_name12 | en:brochures:antifalefkosha:omospondia [2025/04/20 19:33] (current) – external edit 127.0.0.1 | ||
---|---|---|---|
Line 25: | Line 25: | ||
**Nationalism, | **Nationalism, | ||
+ | As an anti-fascist collective we believe that the history of fascism in Cyprus is intertwined with the history of nationalisms and bicommunal conflicts. The genealogy of both fascism and the hegemony of the nationalist right on the island is traced through the rise of irredentist nationalisms in the 1950s, the murders of leftists from their community and members of the other community by EOKA and TMT, the paramilitary gangs of 1963 and 1967, the coups of 1974 and the final realization of the dream of Turkish nationalism. The political ancestors of fascism in Cyprus are none other than its national heroes, none other than those responsible for the conflicts, the division and repression of the working class, the present political cesspool in which the island finds itself. The struggle against fascism is therefore necessarily a struggle against nationalism and all the consequences it has caused. | ||
- | As an antifascist collective we consider the history of fascism in Cyprus | + | The struggle against |
- | The battle against fascism in Cyprus | + | As long as the Cyprus |
- | As long as the Cyprus issue exists education will continue to result in the learning | + | We recognise that the process for the resolution |
- | We recognise | + | It is therefore a fact that for a part of Cypriot, Turkish and Greek capital, |
- | It is a fact then that for a part of Cypriot, Turkish and also Greek Capital, | + | On the other hand, we recognize both that the geopolitical interests |
- | On the other hand, we recognise both that the geopolitical interests of the concerned powers could settle on a plan other than that of a federal Cyprus, as well as that other significant section | + | At the same time, as mentioned above, there are also parts of local capital and the ruling |
- | At the same time, there are also, as mentioned above, parts of local capital | + | The basic argument of the discourse produced both by these voices of the bourgeoisie, which have much to lose politically and/or economically, and by a significant part of the left (local and not only) is that Bi-zonal Bicommunal Federation (BBF) is racist because it divides the population |
- | The main argument that is produced both from these voices | + | The well-known slogan "one man, one vote", the motto of the Greek Cypriot anti-federalist campaign, basically hides the authoritarianism |
- | The well-known slogan of "one person one vote", a banner in the Greek-Cypriot anti-federation campaign, primarily hides the authoritarianism that may arise from the principle | + | No one can guarantee that an upcoming federation-based agreement will solve all problems, nor are we under any such illusions. But we are not, as we have said, talking about the outcome, but about the beginning of our own cause. The Cyprus Problem is the result |
- | No-one | + | To return to our original position: the transition to a federal Cyprus |
- | To come back to our principle position: the process to a federal Cyprus is a necessity because the transition may offer a terrain more conducive towards combatting the nationalism and militarism of the island, towards changing the ethnocentrism in education and refuting the geographical partition, through which we shall be in a position to assert a total change of ecological responses of the island. From Akamas to the Karpass peninsula we will have to struggle to protect the last environmental " | + | antifa λευkoşa |
--- | --- |
en/brochures/antifalefkosha/omospondia.1740670684.txt.gz · Last modified: 2025/04/20 19:43 (external edit)